So, you are advocating the old head-in-the-sand strategy. Brilliant!
We appear to be living in a nation of gimps. People must be free to be gimps, if they choose, but there are several million of us whom gimpitude simply does not suit.
We must, as a matter of urgency, organise our political separation from the mask masticating masses.
While your head is in the sand, there is no limit to what they might stick in your ass.
Thank you for your comment! It's good to get pushback.
I disagree with your interpretation. I'm advocating the opposite of a head-in-the-sand strategy. I would like to see a longer term approach to cultural redressing. As I explain in my article, the WHO/technocrat clique did not get there in 3 years but in several decades. We need to be able to see past the politics of the day. Of course we should pay attention to things like the Pandemic Treaty and the more concerning IHR 2005 Amendments which would allow the WHO to incrust itself further in our national government's machinery.
Short term solutions based on a "headless chicken run" strategy won't achieve anything.
you might want to read another of my articles in which I explain how we can tune into a mindset that will allow us to get rid of the utopians of the UN and the WEF:
Thank you for the link to “How to rid …”, which proved to be a second essay I enjoyed up to, but not including, its conclusion.
I take your line there to be that whatever occurs, in the next year or so, will be completely irrelevant by the end of the millennium. I’m inclined to think you’re probably right, but it’d barely be sensible for us to agree a wager, anyway.
My concern is the remainder of my own life, and for the times of the current generations that will survive me. Some reversion to the mean, centuries later, is scant consolation.
Diving back to your reply, I perceive a critical fallacy: Whereas you are, in my view, correct that the “WHO/technocrat clique” required “several decades” to place its boots upon our throats, it certainly does not follow that we have a similar period in which to extricate ourselves.
Furthermore, I suspect that what you intend by “technocrat clique” is less expansive than it ought to have been.
The important fact is that, for a very long time, most countries have been controlled by an unremarked elite.
This “long time” might actually be measured in millennia. (It may not be coincidental that Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson is a 29th great-grandson of William the Conqueror, and, separately, a 36th great-grandson of Alfred the Great.) But, we certainly have sufficient clarity, in the past century, of Rockefellers (of whom John D. is a 24th great-grandson of William the Conqueror, and a 31st great-grandson of Alfred the Great), Gateses (of whom Billy Boy is a 28th great-grandson of William the Conqueror and a 34th great-grandson of Alfred the Great), George Soros, Warren Buffett (27th great-grandson of William the Conqueror and 34th great-grandson of Alfred the Great), the Bushes (of whom GHW was a 26th great-grandson of William the Conqueror and a 32nd great-grandson of Alfred the Great), Rothschilds/Rothschildren, Keith Rupert Murdoch, the WEF (established by Heinz Kissinger), the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission (which comprises/comprised Kissinger, Sir Keir Starmer, Jeffery Epstein, and others), etc., to appreciate there is a controlling structure (or somewhat competing controlling structures) other than that traced by our “democratic” institutions.
As Frank Zappa warned, “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theatre.” The bad news, for us, is that we are on the cusp of the great revelation, although we should not bet on the majority actually noticing it.
New terms and conditions are being forced upon us. This has been enabled, principally, by two major developments. Firstly, the industrial revolution cut the elite’s reliance upon human labour for maintaining them in the manner to which they had become accustomed. More recently, the advent of AI has rendered the proletariat very close to surplus to that requirement.
Moreover, these technologies combine to create the possibility of forcibly managing the masses with intelligent machines, rather than relying upon the combination of deception and concession previously necessary to keep them compliant. We are in the era of assassination drones and killer robots. That everyone is so blasé dumbfounds me.
The WHO is merely one of the puppets (human and institutional) enticing, nudging, and herding, us into our new, disimproved, conditions, and squeezing us down to our designated, minimal, footprint
Once you have entered the technological lobster pot, you will not get out alive. Should they allow you sufficient freedom of thought, you will, though, be able to dream of a distant future in which the exploitation of others has fallen out of fashion.
Finally, here is something I previously wrote (and which has achieved nothing in the interim):
So, you are advocating the old head-in-the-sand strategy. Brilliant!
We appear to be living in a nation of gimps. People must be free to be gimps, if they choose, but there are several million of us whom gimpitude simply does not suit.
We must, as a matter of urgency, organise our political separation from the mask masticating masses.
While your head is in the sand, there is no limit to what they might stick in your ass.
Thank you for your comment! It's good to get pushback.
I disagree with your interpretation. I'm advocating the opposite of a head-in-the-sand strategy. I would like to see a longer term approach to cultural redressing. As I explain in my article, the WHO/technocrat clique did not get there in 3 years but in several decades. We need to be able to see past the politics of the day. Of course we should pay attention to things like the Pandemic Treaty and the more concerning IHR 2005 Amendments which would allow the WHO to incrust itself further in our national government's machinery.
Short term solutions based on a "headless chicken run" strategy won't achieve anything.
you might want to read another of my articles in which I explain how we can tune into a mindset that will allow us to get rid of the utopians of the UN and the WEF:
https://theslingshot.substack.com/p/how-to-rid-society-of-the-utopian
Pablo,
Thank you for the link to “How to rid …”, which proved to be a second essay I enjoyed up to, but not including, its conclusion.
I take your line there to be that whatever occurs, in the next year or so, will be completely irrelevant by the end of the millennium. I’m inclined to think you’re probably right, but it’d barely be sensible for us to agree a wager, anyway.
My concern is the remainder of my own life, and for the times of the current generations that will survive me. Some reversion to the mean, centuries later, is scant consolation.
Diving back to your reply, I perceive a critical fallacy: Whereas you are, in my view, correct that the “WHO/technocrat clique” required “several decades” to place its boots upon our throats, it certainly does not follow that we have a similar period in which to extricate ourselves.
Furthermore, I suspect that what you intend by “technocrat clique” is less expansive than it ought to have been.
The important fact is that, for a very long time, most countries have been controlled by an unremarked elite.
This “long time” might actually be measured in millennia. (It may not be coincidental that Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson is a 29th great-grandson of William the Conqueror, and, separately, a 36th great-grandson of Alfred the Great.) But, we certainly have sufficient clarity, in the past century, of Rockefellers (of whom John D. is a 24th great-grandson of William the Conqueror, and a 31st great-grandson of Alfred the Great), Gateses (of whom Billy Boy is a 28th great-grandson of William the Conqueror and a 34th great-grandson of Alfred the Great), George Soros, Warren Buffett (27th great-grandson of William the Conqueror and 34th great-grandson of Alfred the Great), the Bushes (of whom GHW was a 26th great-grandson of William the Conqueror and a 32nd great-grandson of Alfred the Great), Rothschilds/Rothschildren, Keith Rupert Murdoch, the WEF (established by Heinz Kissinger), the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission (which comprises/comprised Kissinger, Sir Keir Starmer, Jeffery Epstein, and others), etc., to appreciate there is a controlling structure (or somewhat competing controlling structures) other than that traced by our “democratic” institutions.
As Frank Zappa warned, “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theatre.” The bad news, for us, is that we are on the cusp of the great revelation, although we should not bet on the majority actually noticing it.
New terms and conditions are being forced upon us. This has been enabled, principally, by two major developments. Firstly, the industrial revolution cut the elite’s reliance upon human labour for maintaining them in the manner to which they had become accustomed. More recently, the advent of AI has rendered the proletariat very close to surplus to that requirement.
Moreover, these technologies combine to create the possibility of forcibly managing the masses with intelligent machines, rather than relying upon the combination of deception and concession previously necessary to keep them compliant. We are in the era of assassination drones and killer robots. That everyone is so blasé dumbfounds me.
The WHO is merely one of the puppets (human and institutional) enticing, nudging, and herding, us into our new, disimproved, conditions, and squeezing us down to our designated, minimal, footprint
Once you have entered the technological lobster pot, you will not get out alive. Should they allow you sufficient freedom of thought, you will, though, be able to dream of a distant future in which the exploitation of others has fallen out of fashion.
Finally, here is something I previously wrote (and which has achieved nothing in the interim):
https://ourdecisiontoo.com/Issue/there-s-nothing-left-to-do-but-go-our-separate-ways/320